<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Agile use Kanban?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomlooy.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/does-agile-use-kanban/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomlooy.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/does-agile-use-kanban/</link>
	<description>Saturday Morning eMails on Agile, Lean, Theory of Constraints, Deming etc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 22:02:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Gluck</title>
		<link>http://tomlooy.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/does-agile-use-kanban/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gluck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 22:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomlooy.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been playing with this notion a lot lately, since I&#039;ve been working on a new workflow for our issue tracker that a few of our colleagues and I developed. 

Issue trackers often operate on a &quot;push&quot; model.  In other words, you are assigned to work on piece of functionality because the person who is in front of has completed it and it now there.  If you let it sit there, your manager or PM will get on your case because everyone knows it&#039;s your turn.  You are expected to expand your capacity to what is &quot;pushed&quot; to you.

Since I favor a pull system, I&#039;d like to have statuses in the issue tracker that reflect the notion of &quot;pull&quot;.  So if a BA completes a story, it is in a &quot;Refined&quot; state and remains in that state until a developer has completed it.  It then goes into a &quot;Developed&quot; state and remains there until it is Done.  What I like about this model is that it removes assignment from the picture and allows those managing the project to optimize by looking at the status of the stories.  The idea is that this system will make the constraint stick out like a sore thumb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been playing with this notion a lot lately, since I&#8217;ve been working on a new workflow for our issue tracker that a few of our colleagues and I developed. </p>
<p>Issue trackers often operate on a &#8220;push&#8221; model.  In other words, you are assigned to work on piece of functionality because the person who is in front of has completed it and it now there.  If you let it sit there, your manager or PM will get on your case because everyone knows it&#8217;s your turn.  You are expected to expand your capacity to what is &#8220;pushed&#8221; to you.</p>
<p>Since I favor a pull system, I&#8217;d like to have statuses in the issue tracker that reflect the notion of &#8220;pull&#8221;.  So if a BA completes a story, it is in a &#8220;Refined&#8221; state and remains in that state until a developer has completed it.  It then goes into a &#8220;Developed&#8221; state and remains there until it is Done.  What I like about this model is that it removes assignment from the picture and allows those managing the project to optimize by looking at the status of the stories.  The idea is that this system will make the constraint stick out like a sore thumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Scotland</title>
		<link>http://tomlooy.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/does-agile-use-kanban/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Scotland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomlooy.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Agile can use a kanban pull system.  I&#039;ve blogged about experiences here - http://availagility.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/a-kanban-system-for-software-development/ - and you&#039;ll be able to find links to other writing from there.

Karl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agile can use a kanban pull system.  I&#8217;ve blogged about experiences here &#8211; <a href="http://availagility.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/a-kanban-system-for-software-development/" rel="nofollow">http://availagility.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/a-kanban-system-for-software-development/</a> &#8211; and you&#8217;ll be able to find links to other writing from there.</p>
<p>Karl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Carlson</title>
		<link>http://tomlooy.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/does-agile-use-kanban/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Carlson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 22:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomlooy.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Absolutely. The Kanban stuff is great, I just always thought to myself. &quot;You&#039;re just moving the inventory outside of the development team.&quot; I wonder if you could actually pull requirements from the customer... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely. The Kanban stuff is great, I just always thought to myself. &#8220;You&#8217;re just moving the inventory outside of the development team.&#8221; I wonder if you could actually pull requirements from the customer&#8230; <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
